Share this site Facebook Twitter StumbleUpon Delicious Divider Share RSS Divider
DOSSIER
19.07.2011

Mission possible

By:
Comments
2

Share this Article:

FacebookFacebook

TwitterTWITTER

StumbleUponSTUMBLEUPON

DeliciousDELICIOUS

Symposium

What makes a ‘Great’ museum?  This is a big question and it seems one that had generated more questions and raised new uncertainty, as opposed to being answered.

At the recent Making a ‘Great’ Art Museum: Contending with Southeast Asian Modernities and Art symposium organised by the NHB Academy and Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore, many questions were raised.  In other words, a genuine discourse took place.

Some speakers questioned the very notion of modernity, debating the difference between modernity and modernism.  Some questioned the definition of ‘great’ and whether the objective of a museum is to be ‘great’.

It all seemed very profound but in general, the consensus was that the very idea of one museum presenting and introducing the histories of our regional ancestors is a major challenge.

No case studies were presented; further underscoring the fact we must establish a Southeast Asian art museum that is truly our own, without the spectre of the West and with an aura that is truly Southeast Asian.  What exactly does that mean?  Well, Southeast Asia is diverse yet distinct, mixed yet uniformly unique, multifaceted yet solitary.

In a nutshell, it is complicated.

The speakers further proposed theories of egalitarianism and impartiality.  In other words, a sense of objectivity and open-mindedness in the museum’s programming.  They want us to embrace art but beyond that, they also want us to adopt a new form of lifestyle and mindset.  Are we able to cultivate this new fashion of living?  It seems we are.  Many expressed optimism and confidence in our region, citing the powers and forces of Asian tigers, our precise geographical location and our rich history.

From the symposium, we hear  that it is not just about the art but the fact that the National Art Gallery, Singapore fulfils the ambition of a nation and a region.  Above being a tourist attraction, it fills a gap on the global art map that is currently gasping with the absence of something uniquely Southeast Asian.

It seems the Gallery has been entrusted with this mission and from the symposium, one can tell they are hard at work.

COMMENTS

Sybil Chiew 20.07.2011 Dear Michael, It’s a Catch 22, isn’t it? Art lovers and creative professionals are passionate and supportive of the arts scene and thus made up a majority of the audience. However, it is not to say that nothing ‘new’ or ‘creative’ was generated. My article was by no means comprehensive or inclusive, as it was not intended to be a summary of an entire day’s proceedings. Interesting ideas and theories were raised, for example, Keng Sen’s proposal for the creation of a world in which museums constitute spaces for human interaction, where people is the centre of all programming, where, if possible, the walls do not have paintings. The thought of a museum without artworks may be unsettling to some, but Keng Sen presented his argument that the core objective of a museum is to engage its audiences. The idea is not terribly radical but it is certainly food for thought. Too bad you missed the symposium; do join us for future sessions. Sybil
Michael 20.07.2011 Hi Sybil just wondering how many were at the symposium that were not sponsored by their organisations and paid for their own tickets? I am only asking this because if it's all the usual suspects (people involved in the cultural/arts scene) then hardly anything 'new' or 'creative' would be discussed since there's already a groupthink mentality.
 1

Add Comment

 

Your email address will not be published. All fields are mandatory.